Re: Want to start HTML?
Posted: 08 Jun 2011, 20:45
so i must start from scratch or analize my code?
Give a child a robot, he'll play for an hour. Teach him to build, and he'll play forever.
https://mindboards.org:443/
Code: Select all
<img src="superbowl_xlv.wmv" width="500" height="350" alt=" To start video right click on your mouse then press open in new window.">
img
. Possibly object
or embed
would work. But again, you really should use YouTube. I would.embed
your movie into your webpage.In a way, yes. I've taken a quick look, and you don't seem to be using any CSS. And you need morethemindstormman wrote:so i must start from scratch
div
s to structure your page in an organized fashion.Code: Select all
<IMG STYLE="position:absolute; TOP:0px; left:0px; WIDTH:1263px; HEIGHT:100px" src="themindstormman3141_home.jpg"
Code: Select all
<img src="superbowl_xlv.wmv" width="500" height="350" alt=" To start video right click on your mouse then press open in new window." />
Code: Select all
<a href="superbowl_xlv.wmv">Click here to see my SuperBowl video!</a>
Yes but then the majority of IE users won't be able to see it.studbrickmaster wrote:
Hmm... I'm not happy with that code. Have you seen the HTML 5 way of putting videos on your site?
http://www.w3schools.com/html5/html5_video.asp
I think that sometimes web page developers (or people that are just playing around ) have to decide to better-support the community of people that will probably be viewing their site. I know that there are some of us that use IE and I have nothing against it at all, but most browsers in this day and age really should support HTML5. If if your browser doesn't, you probably have bigger things (like security) to worry about. You can always include a note that says something to the tune of "HTML5 compatible browser required to view this video" or something like that.timpattinson wrote:Yes but then the majority of IE users won't be able to see it.
I know the people of this forum usually have more sense, I'm using FF7a1
but some people will not see it properly.
And why would that be?timpattinson wrote: PS, w3schools is a bad site.